Environmental activism here seems to work most effectively when deployed for political ends. Private initiatives are not so successful.
A case in point is the Hotel Punta Piqueros, in Con Con which has been constructed beside a declared Nature Sanctuary, the Dunas de Con Con, (itself under threat by property development)
Disregarding the environmental impact, its emplacement shows a stunning disrespect for the forces of nature. Not only is it routinely exposed to the destructive effects of Pacific storms, even a moderate Tsunami would flood its lower levels. And the long-term structural effects of exposure to corrosive salt air, (and seawater in this case) are well known.
.
But despite years of legal battles, construction was only paralysed by the Supreme Court in 2021. Its future is uncertain, the financiers include some of the most powerful of Chile’s familias ricas who will undoubtedly lobby the powers-that-be.
Its yet another example of urban Chilean consumers’ deluded “encanto con la naturaleza” which destroys the very environment they claim to love, and puts themselves at risk at the same time.
I lived for about 6 months within walking distance of this remarkable site in 2015 or 2016, this is one of the most Cuico parts of ConCon (montemar), and there were a number of other good examples of similar destructive projects, including those causing damage to these very dunes, or the nearby pine forest, and more. Yes, I hear you.
Serious money must have changed hands to facilitate the construction of these multistory luxury apartment blocks on top of sand dunes - and in a supposedly protected area to boot.
La brutalidades de Playa Cochoa en Viña del Mar | City Tour
This YouTube video shows the scale of the ConCon Dunes development, where literally hundreds of apartments in high rise blocks dominate the summit. Their lineal emplacement is dictated by the need to offer an uninterrupted “Ocean View” to residents willing to pay a premium to contemplate “la naturaleza del mar”.
In a country beset by chronic housing shortages, at least at the lower end of the scale, these CLP $500M luxury apartments highlight Chile’s persistent inequalities, especially since they are generally purchased as “investments”, not for permanent residence. This phenomenon isn’t confined to Chile’s central region; there are similar developments throughout the country.
Its what happens when Lucre trumps Engineering, Common Sense, and the forces of nature. It also shows up the delusions of well-heeled consumers who, in their quest for a spurious “natural living”, destroy the very environments they seek. Its a worldwide phenomenon, but their Chilean manifestations, those “Santiagos-by-the-Sea”, are particularly egregious examples.
El abogado de la administración del edificio Kandinsky, Pablo Gómez, reveló que los 38 departamentos que conforman la torre fueron robados.
Esto se da a conocer luego que se reportara la misma situación en otro de los edificios que están sin moradores tras los socavones en el sector de Cochoa, correspondiente al Miramar Reñaca.
The Con Con Municipality and the owners of this eyesore have reached an “accommodation”…
Así, *se pone fin al uso hotelero, siendo destinado a gastronomía, oficinas, café, cowork, eventos, centro de investigación, galería de arte, spa, consultas médicas, comercio de emprendedores, y polo de desarrollo turístico comunal.
…which conveniently ignores the main issue, ie it should never have been built there at all. Money talks, I guess.
In yet another case, five tower blocks were declared uninhabitable in Viña after a slippage of 3cm was detected in one of the towers.
However the apartment owners didn’t like this, and lodged an appeal, declaring that the decision was arbitrary and illegal. The appeal was rejected:
…las condiciones del lugar configuran una amenaza de riesgo y peligro por una eventual remoción en masa que, de materializarse, por su especial ubicación, podría afectar la estabilidad estructural del edificio Euromarina II, ocasionando eventualmente su colapso y derrumbe".
Which yet again begs the question that, given Chile’s strict anti-seismic construction norms, why were so many apartment blocks built in areas with poor soil conditions.
In a comment published in response to this article, the first represents Common Sense, while the reply demonstrates the typical porfiadez del Chileno, ignoring the concept of Failsafe Design.
